ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Evaluation of changes in chemical composition and antioxidant activities from vine tea at different harvest times based on LC-MS, GC-MS, and data fusion algorithms.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Fixation and Drying on the Physicochemical Quality and Aroma Profiles of Vine Tea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in Active Components, Antioxidant Activity and Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quercetin as a multifaceted neuroprotective agent against cerebral ischaemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Combined metabolomics and electronic tongue technology elucidated the mechanisms of regulation of color-taste characteristics of Huangqin (Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Assessment of Tenderness and Anthocyanin Content in Zijuan Tea Fresh Leaves Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Fused with Visual Features.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically analyzed the chemical composition of vine tea using LC-MS and GC-MS to determine its optimal harvest time and key antioxidant compounds. By employing mass defect filtering (MDF) and a data fusion algorithm, the study examined compositional changes across different harvesting periods. The results identified 62 and 57 compounds through GC-MS and LC-MS, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.