ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Fish are poor sentinels for surveillance of riverine antimicrobial resistance.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Kocuria rhizophila Bacteria Isolated From Salmo munzuricus (Teleostei: Salmonidae) Samples in Natural Resources.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Editorial: Antimicrobial resistance in aquatic environments - Bridging surveillance, ecology, and one health action.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Asian Seabass (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the environment is crucial for assessing the human and animal health risk of AMR pollution. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are one of the main sources of AMR pollutants discharged into water bodies. One important factor for assessing the risks associated with such pollution is the colonization potential of the resistant bacteria (ARB) and resistance genes (ARGs) from the environment into human or animal microbiomes upon exposure. This study explores whether fish can act as sentinels for surveillance of AMR pollution in general and specifically the human colonization potential of ARB in rivers impacted by WWTP effluents. Two riverine fish species, Brown trout, and European bullhead, were sampled up- and downstream a German WWTP. The two fish species were chosen due to their different lifestyles: Trout are mainly actively swimming in the water phase, while bullheads are sedentary and river sediment-associated. The bacterial microbiomes and resistomes of fish gills, skin, and feces were compared with those of the respective river water and sediment up- and downstream of the WWTP. Microbiomes of both fish mirrored the changes in river water and sediment downstream of the WWTP, with significant shifts in bacterial community composition, particularly an increase in Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia. However, increases in ARG abundances observed in water and sediment downstream of the WWTP were not reflected in any of the fish-associated resistomes. This indicates that while the fish microbiome is sensitive to environmental changes, resistomes of poikilothermic animals such as fish are less responsive to colonization by ARB originating from WWTPs and may not serve as effective sentinels for assessing AMR pollution and colonization risks in freshwater environments. This study highlights the complexity of using wildlife as indicators for environmental AMR pollution and suggests that other species are better suited for surveillance efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.