ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Network analysis of quality of life among young and middle-aged Korean cancer survivors.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One size does not fit all: data-driven insights of patient-reported outcomes to tailor supportive care in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- The utility of psychometric network analysis for the study of social isolation, loneliness, and social support in persons with cancer: methodology and future directions.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify and compare the network structure of quality of life factors among cancer survivors to inform tailored interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 330 cancer survivors aged 18-64 years, drawn from the 2019-2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Participants were categorized into two groups: cancer survivors with current cancer and those without. Network analysis using the EBICglasso algorithm was performed to assess eight quality of life (QoL) components measured by the Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 8 Items (HINT-8) scale: climbing stairs, pain, vitality, work ability, depression, memory, sleep quality, and happiness. Results: The network analysis revealed distinct patterns between the two groups. Among survivors with current cancer, depression, work ability, and vitality were the most central QoL components, suggesting a need for targeted psychological and occupational support. In contrast, survivors without current cancer exhibited a network where work ability, pain, and climbing stairs (physical function) played a dominant role, emphasizing the importance of pain management and functional rehabilitation. Work ability emerged as a critical determinant in both groups, indicating its sustained impact throughout the survivorship continuum. Additionally, the network structure in survivors without current cancer showed greater interconnectedness, reflecting the complex interplay of long-term survivorship challenges. Conclusions: The study highlights the need for personalized, stage-specific interventions in cancer survivorship. Work remained central in both groups, emphasizing its ongoing impact on quality of life throughout the survivorship journey. While psychological support is crucial to cancer survivors with current cancer due to the centrality of depression, long-term pain management becomes increasingly important post-treatment. These findings provide valuable insights for nursing practice, suggesting that tailored interventions addressing work-related challenges, psychological distress, and chronic symptom management could improve quality of life and facilitate survivors' reintegration into daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.