ArticleRadiology case reports2025
An incidental finding of an ectopic intrauterine device (IUD) in the urinary bladder wall in a female presented with missed abortion.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine perforation and migration of intrauterine devices (IUDs) are rare complications that can present significant clinical challenges. We report the case of a 28-year-old woman who came in with a missed abortion at 11 weeks of gestation and was unexpectedly found to have an IUD embedded in the wall of her urinary bladder. She had a history of 5 pregnancies and a copper IUD was inserted a year ago. Although she presented with mild vaginal bleeding, there were no typical urinary symptoms to suggest a problem. However, imaging revealed the copper IUD had migrated outside the uterus and lodged in the bladder. After managing her pregnancy complications with evacuation and curettage, plans were made for surgical removal of the IUD. This case highlights how important it is to consider IUD migration, even when urinary symptoms are not present, in patients with unexplained pelvic issues. Early detection through imaging and prompt removal of the device are essential to prevent further complications. It also emphasizes the value of regular follow-up and patient education to ensure timely identification of potential issues before they escalate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.