ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Application of machine learning in predicting adolescent Internet behavioral addiction.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aggression and emotional distress in adolescents: a cross-sectional chain mediation model of internet addiction and somatization.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Experiential avoidance and smartphone addiction in adolescents: a study using multi-model machine learning and mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Protocol for AI-based prediction of problematic digital technology use among Indian youth: a Centre for Advanced Research on Addictive Behaviours initiative.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychological and technological predictors of the physical activity intention-behavior gap: an explainable machine learning analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the risk factors affecting adolescents' Internet addiction behavior and build a prediction model for adolescents' Internet addiction behavior based on machine learning algorithms. Methods: A total of 4461 high school students in Chongqing were selected using stratified cluster sampling, and questionnaires were administered. Based on the presence of Internet addiction behavior, students were categorized into an Internet addiction group (n=1210) and a non-Internet addiction group (n=3115). Gender, age, residence type, and other data were compared between the groups, and independent risk factors for adolescent Internet addiction were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Six methods-multi-level perceptron, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting-were used to construct the model. The model's indicators under each algorithm were compared, evaluated with a confusion matrix, and the optimal model was selected. Result: The proportion of male adolescents, urban household registration, and scores on the family function, planning, action, and cognitive subscales, along with psychoticism, introversion-extroversion, neuroticism, somatization, obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, and psychosis, were significantly higher in the Internet addiction group than in the non-Internet addiction group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in age or only-child status (P > 0.05). Statistically significant variables were analyzed using a logistic regression model, revealing that gender, household registration type, and scores on planning, action, introversion-extroversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, cognitive, obsessive-compulsive, depression, and hostility scales are independent risk factors for adolescent Internet addiction. The area under the curve (AUC) for multi-level perceptron, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting models were 0.843, 0.817, 0.778, 0.846, 0.847, and 0.836, respectively, with extreme gradient boosting showing the best predictive performance among these models. Conclusion: The detection rate of Internet addiction is higher in males than in females, and adolescents with impulsive, extroverted, psychotic, neurotic, obsessive, depressive, and hostile traits are more prone to developing Internet addiction. While the overall performance of the machine learning models for predicting adolescent Internet addiction is moderate, the extreme gradient boosting method outperforms others, effectively identifying risk factors and enabling targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.