ArticleJournal of bone oncology2025
Bone cement implantation syndrome in patients with cemented endoprostheses for metastatic bone disease in the femur.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patent foramen ovale, bone cement implantation syndrome and paradoxical embolism : Case study and pathophysiological aspects.Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with bone metastases in the femur (BMf) may experience pathological fractures requiring surgery with cemented endoprostheses (EPR). At cementation and prosthesis insertion, patients are at risk of experiencing hypoxia, hypotension, cardiac failure and potentially death, known as bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS). We aimed to 1) investigate the incidence and grade of BCIS in patients with BMf treated with cemented EPR, and 2) examine if the incidence or extent of BCIS has decreased after a change of a combined anesthesiologic and surgical protocol. Methods: We retrospectively assessed patients with BMf operated with cemented EPR in two periods 2017 - 2018 (early cohort) and 2019 - 2020 (late cohort) and stratified before and after the intervention. Results: Comparing the early and late cohorts, 26/86 (32 %) vs. 30/80 (35 %) experienced BCIS, but mild BCIS (grade 0 + 1) was seen in 79 % vs. 86 %, and severe BCIS (grade 2 + 3) in 21 % vs. 14 %. In the late cohort the per-operative use of vasopressors was higher (86 % vs. 59 %, p < 0.001), we found fewer pulmonary embolisms (PE) (p = 0.024), and a trend toward a reduced length of stay (LOS). 30-day survival was lower for patients with grade 0 + 1 compared to grade 2 + 3 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: BCIS occurs in more than 1/3 of patients operated for BMf with cemented EPR. An increased multidisciplinary focus on BCIS may reduce the complications of BCIS, such as PE and LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.