ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Integrating silver diamine fluoride into school-based oral health programs: A pilot study.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- School-Based Access to and Delivery of Oral Health Care.The Journal of school health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current approaches to school-based caries prevention can increase access to oral healthcare, but are often limited by costs and other logistical challenges. Evidence from large pragmatic trials support the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to prevent and control caries in school dental programs. In this pilot, we developed implementation strategies and integrated SDF into an existing school-based dental program, Smiles For Students (SFS). Methods: This was a single-group observational pilot. Using a school-based SDF implementation toolkit, SFS clinicians received training in clinical protocols as well as ongoing interactive technical assistance to support SDF integration. SDF was then implemented into existing clinical workflows. Results: Following training and implementation, the Smiles For Students program saw a 23 % increase in the number of patients served, a 53 % decrease in the per-child treatment time, a 45 % decrease in labor costs despite increased enrollment, and a 24 % decrease in supply costs. Qualitative feedback indicated strong support for simplified clinical protocols, reduction in cumbersome supplies and materials, and increased flexibility with space and resources. Conclusions: In a pilot implementation project in which SDF was integrated into an existing school-based dental program serving 16 schools, multiple logistical and economic challenges were mitigated and program clinicians utilized both sealants and SDF to meet the needs of participating children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.