ReviewExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Through the lens of rural patients and pharmacies: A content analysis of state level pharmacy benefit manager regulations and policies.
Review in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of digital pharmaceutical governance in alleviating health inequality: a case study of the "Sanya Model" for centralized regional prescription review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- A Silent Health Care Emergency: The Disappearance of North Carolina Community Pharmacies.North Carolina medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) are responsible for establishing community pharmacy reimbursement practices and prices to varying degrees. Understanding PBMs' reimbursement practices is necessary for the continued viability of community pharmacies located in underserved and rural patient communities. Currently, there is a gap in literature exploring PBM reform and the impact this legislation has on rural pharmacy practice. Objectives: This content analysis reviews the legislation complied by the National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) and determines its benefits to pharmacies and patients in rural areas. Methods: The NCPA PBM Reform legislation document included bills from 48 states and the District of Columbia, that were introduced between November 30, 2018, through December 7, 2021. Bills were classified as enacted ( Results: Fifty-seven bills were included in the content analysis, where six categories were identified using thematic analysis and classified as: PBM Operations, Drug Pricing, Transparency, Reimbursements, Cost Sharing, and Prior Authorization. Only twenty-two bills were identified as potentially benefitting both rural pharmacies and rural patients through inclusion of legislation managing PBM practices involving patient steering, network adequacy, pricing transparency, reforming cost-sharing structures, and streamlining prior authorization processes. Conclusions: This study identifies multiple PBM legislation categories having the potential to impact rural pharmacy operations and patient outcomes. However, further research is needed to understand the specific financial and clinical impact of these PBM legislation categories on rural communities and rural pharmacy practice, as well as their alignment with enabling pharmacists to combat unique health disparities and challenges facing rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.