ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Fully automatic HER2 tissue segmentation for interpretable HER2 scoring.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: impact and interplay with HER3 expression.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Transformer-BasedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, with HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) overexpression playing a critical role in regulating cell growth and division. HER2 status, assessed according to established scoring guidelines, offers important information for treatment selection. However, the complexity of the task leads to variability in human rater assessments. In this work, we propose a fully automated, interpretable HER2 scoring pipeline based on pixel-level semantic segmentations, designed to align with clinical guidelines. Using polygon annotations, our method balances annotation effort with the ability to capture fine-grained details and larger structures, such as non-invasive tumor tissue. To enhance HER2 segmentation, we propose the use of a Wasserstein Dice loss to model class relationships, ensuring robust segmentation and HER2 scoring performance. Additionally, based on observations of pathologists' behavior in clinical practice, we propose a calibration step to the scoring rules, which positively impacts the accuracy and consistency of automated HER2 scoring. Our approach achieves an F1 score of 0.832 on HER2 scoring, demonstrating its effectiveness. This work establishes a potent segmentation pipeline that can be further leveraged to analyze HER2 expression in breast cancer tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.