ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical characteristics of
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel risk stratification model based on creatine kinase and direct bilirubin for identifying severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: a double-center, hypothesis-generating retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Comparative transcriptomics reveals genes commonly induced by distinct stressors inInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- Clinical management and pharmaceutical care of severeFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Successful azithromycin treatment ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Hearing loss as the initial manifestation ofIDCases · 2026Article
- Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Severe Disease in 57 Cases ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Comparative Transcriptomics Reveals Genes Commonly Induced by Distinct Stressors inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Epidemiological characteristics of human psittacosis in Guangdong Province, China, 2019-2024.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With this study, we aimed to explore the clinical features, laboratory examinations, imaging features, and severe predictors of Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 39 patients diagnosed with Results: Compared to the non-psittacosis community-acquired pneumonia group, the common Conclusion: Fatigue, myalgia, low Hb, low ALB, high ALT, and high AST are predictors of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.