ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Diagnostic accuracy of the Scandinavian guidelines for minor and moderate head trauma in children: a prospective, pragmatic, validation study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines for pediatric head trauma on the management in the emergency department-a retrospective time series analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Article
- Comparison of predictive tools for management of paediatric mild TBI: a prospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines for initial management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) support decision making, but they are rarely validated. The Scandinavian guideline for management of children with TBI (SNC16) was developed to minimise the use of cranial computed tomography (cCT) without compromising safety, but the performance of the guideline in a real-world population is unknown. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy for the SNC16 in a large, pragmatic cohort of children. Methods: In this prospective, observational, international cohort study in 16 Swedish and Norwegian emergency departments (EDs), children (aged <18 years) with blunt head trauma, presenting within 24 h of injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale of 9-15, were prospectively enrolled. The primary outcome measure was presence of a composite variable (clinically important intracranial injury (CIII) comprised of death, neurosurgery, admission to hospital ward ≥2 days due to head injury, or intubation ≥1 day due to pathological cCT findings), all within one week from trauma. Secondary outcome measures were neurosurgery and significant trauma related findings on cCT. Findings: A total of 3012 children were enrolled from April 2018 to May 2024. Nine patients fulfilled the primary variable CIII (0.30%; 9/3012), two patients required neurosurgery (0.07%; 2/3012), and 27 patients showed significant trauma related findings on cCT (0.90%; 27/3012). Point sensitivities to detect CIII, neurosurgery and significant cCT findings were 100% (CI 95% 70%-100% [9/9]; 34%-100% [2/2]; and 87%-100% [27/27]). Point specificity was 41.3%, 41.2%, and 41.6% (CI 95% 40%-43% [1241/3003]; 39%-43% [1241/3010]; and 40%-43% [1241/2985]). Negative predictive values were 100% for CIII, neurosurgery and significant cCT findings (CI 95% 99.7%-100.0% for all). Application of the SNC16 guidelines would have resulted in a mandatory cCT rate of 3.4% (101/3012) and immediate discharge from the ED for 41.2% (1241/3012) of children. No children with a discharge recommendation were positive for any primary or secondary outcomes. Interpretation: Validation of the SNC16 guideline showed adequate diagnostic performance in a real-world cohort, supporting formal implementation. Funding: Non-commercially (Swedish state) funded by Sӧdra Sjukvårdsregionen and Vetenskapliga Rådet, Hallands Hospital and Forskning och Utveckling, Halland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.