ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Operationalizing a complex acute clinical trial: Lessons from the BEACH study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05020535 (Biomarker and Edema Attenuation in IntraCerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biomarker and Edema Attenuation in IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (BEACH) Phase 2a Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To outline the workflow, challenges, and key roles involved in operationalizing a complex, acute clinical trial protocol requiring multidisciplinary collaboration. Summary: Yale University School of Medicine and the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Yale New Haven Hospital leverage interdisciplinary collaboration to successfully enroll patients into complex clinical trials, including the Biomarker and Edema Attenuation in IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (BEACH) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05020535). The research team proactively educates nursing staff and clinicians on the study protocol, in addition to facilitating communication with the investigational drug pharmacy and supporting treating physicians in screening, enrollment, and follow-up. With 24/7 access to the research team, study coordinators are present for all protocol steps, including test article infusion, biospecimen collection and processing, and participant interactions. Successful execution of the BEACH trial relies on five key domains: ensuring patient safety in a high acuity setting, optimizing screening and enrollment processes, implementing efficient workflows for pharmacokinetic sampling and test article administration, identifying signals of efficacy, and adapting to operational challenges. These domains require precise coordination, clear communication, and adaptability within dynamic patient care environments. By streamlining workflows and maintaining open communication, the research team enhances efficiency and optimizes patient enrollment while upholding the highest standards of ethical research and patient care. Conclusion: Implementation of the BEACH trial at Yale exemplifies the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration in advancing clinical research. By integrating research into patient care, the study team not only enhances trial efficiency, but also contributes to the development of innovative treatment strategies for intracerebral hemorrhage. Moving forward, the lessons learned from operationalizing BEACH can inform best practices for future acute trials, ensuring that research continues to drive meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.