ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2025
Solid tumour cellular therapy - principles of toxicity management.
Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in melanoma: ready for prime time?British journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Advances in cell therapy for solid tumours: European perspective and future directions.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- HosTIL territory: mapping the landscape of toxicity in TIL therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Ready or not, here they come: a practical guide to adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumors for medical oncologists.The oncologist · 2026Review
- From Immunobiology to Clinical Application: Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Melanoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Checkpoint inhibition and beyond: Precision immune engineering for the immune-privileged landscape of ocular malignancies.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Boosting Dendritic Cell Function in Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Leveraging T cells for cancer immunotherapy.Immunity & inflammation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of lifileucel and afami-cel for patients with advanced melanoma and synovial sarcoma, respectively, there is a need for improved understanding and guidance regarding the management of toxicity associated with adoptive cellular therapies (ACTs) for solid tumours. Further approvals are expected in coming years, with toxicity management representing a significant consideration for centres looking to implement such advanced therapy medicinal products. Importantly, first-generation tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies are associated with unique toxicities compared with gene-modified T-cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) and T-cell receptor-modified therapy (TCR T), presenting novel challenges for treating healthcare professionals. Extrapolating from experience with CAR T in the field of haemato-oncology, coupled with the historical use of high-dose interleukin-2 in solid tumour therapeutic regimens and more recently lifileucel and afami-cel, has led to the development of core principles for managing toxicity, which is discussed here. Looking to the future, a rapidly developing field with next-generation ACT products, a basic knowledge of such core principles will be an important foundation for healthcare professionals working in this space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.