Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40236324›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Food neophobia among university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey of prevalence and predictor analysis.

Najim Z Alshahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Najim Z AlshahraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the absence of scientific information on food neophobia (i.e., fear or reluctance to try new or unfamiliar foods) among young adults in Saudi Arabia, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and predictors of food neophobia in Saudi university students. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 480 students from two public universities of Saudi Arabia. The data was collected via an internet-based structured questionnaire. Participants' sociodemographic, health and behavioral information were included as explanatory variables (15 variables). Participants' food neophobia was assessed using a10-item validated food neophobia scale. A logistic regression model was fitted to find out the predictors of food neophobia. Results: Approximately half of the participants (49.6%) exhibited food neophobia. Participants who engaged in regular physical exercise had a lower risk of developing food neophobia than their counterparts (AOR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.20-0.92). Participants with food allergies (AOR: 4.36, 95%CI: 2.73-6.94) and disordered eating attitudes (AOR: 2.52, 95%CI: 1.27-5.02) and who took dietary supplements (AOR: 6.76, 95%CI: 3.54-12.90) were more likely to be food neophobic. Moreover, participants' preferences for fish and sea food (r Conclusion: A higher level of food neophobia was observed among surveyed university students in Saudi Arabia. Several factors, such as regular physical exercise, food allergies, dietary supplement consumption, and disordered eating attitudes, were found to be associated with food neophobia. To provide empirical evidence on food neophobia, additional research with large and representative samples could be performed in other regions of Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adulteating disordereating habitsfood neophobiafood preferencestudents

Identifiers

PMID40236324
PMCPMC11996773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.