ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A questionnaire for a conceptual framework and interdisciplinary public health research using the Delphi technique-development and validation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informational and structural barriers to exercise oncology care in Spain: development of the MOVE-Onco questionnaire and preliminary findings.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Developing a Shared Understanding of Humanism in Health Care Through Critical Review and Empirical Exploration: Protocol for a Modified e-Delphi Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Assessing Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, Intentions, Abilities, and Behaviour Toward Physical Activity and Exercise in Non-Communicable Diseases: Questionnaire Development Using an e-Delphi and Cross-Sectional Design.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and initial validation of a modular life-course health education and science communication needs scale for Chinese clinical and community service users: a Tianjin-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and consensus-based validation of a comprehensive population survey instrument for municipal crisis preparedness: a three-round Delphi study (KOMPAKT112).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Construct validity and internal reliability of the healthcare provider performance scale.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Three-phase development of the health capital questionnaire: a mixed methods operationalization study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development of a risk factor framework to inform machine learning prediction of young people's mental health problems: a Delphi study.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: A conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Delphi technique has become established in public health research, yet there is a lack of methodological standards in questionnaire development. We here demonstrate how the Delphi technique can be used in an interdisciplinary public health topic for framework development, and we highlight methodological challenges and possible solutions. Methods: We developed the questionnaire through a comprehensive literature review and the generation of an item pool based on the rules of item construction. We used cognitive interviews, a Delphi experts assessment and group discussions to refine the questionnaire and to ensure content validity. Finally, we carried out a pre-test of the online questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire consists of three main sections, namely gender (norms), the social environment and the mental health of adolescents, and another section on characteristics of the panelists. It comprises a total of 32 questions and includes rating and ranking questions, content-related and comment questions, open and closed questions as well as questions on personal characteristics and evaluation questions. Conclusion: To address challenges in the development process, interdisciplinary researchers need to be involved. They should consider certain aspects of the development process to provide more structure and clarity, such as comprehensively preprocessing the content, and disentangling and simplifying the theoretical concepts. They should consider a rigorous approach to develop more complex frameworks for interdisciplinary public health topics. Future research should focus on developing methodological guidelines and testing their applicability for different objectives of the Delphi technique (e.g., framework development).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.