ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Unveiling Patient Perspectives: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient Experiences Undergoing Cleft Care by All-Women Surgical Teams.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although women provide approximately 75% of healthcare globally, they are underrepresented in healthcare leadership, surgery, and anesthesia. Patient- provider gender concordance has been shown to improve patient experience in high-income settings; however, patients in low-and middle-income countries often lack the opportunity to choose the gender of their provider and there is a paucity of literature on the importance of women healthcare providers in these settings. Aim: To assess the experiences and provider gender preferences of patients with cleft and their caregivers before and after receiving care from an all-women surgical team in a Women in Medicine (WIM) surgical program. Methods: This cross-sectional study is based on an anonymous survey administered to patients 15 years or older or their caregivers after receiving care from an all-women surgical team during four distinct cleft surgery programs in Morocco, Peru, Malawi, and the Philippines throughout 2022. Analysis included quantitative, descriptive statistics, chi-squared and f-tests. Results: Before the program, 20% of participants had never received care from women physicians and only 35% preferred women as their healthcare provider. After the program, 66% preferred women as their healthcare provider (p<0.001) with the highest proportion in Morocco (90%) and lowest in Malawi and the Philippines (55%). Across all education levels, most participants preferred women after the program (64%) and 98% were satisfied or more than satisfied with the care received. The three most influential characteristics for preferring women were their understanding, patience, and communication. Conclusion: Participation in the WIM program provided some patients with their first opportunity to experience receiving care from a woman. This exposure may influence their preference for a healthcare provider, which has been shown to enhance patient experience. Programs like this are imperative to increasing visibility of women in surgical and healthcare leadership roles, improving patient experience, and increasing access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.