ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Accumbal Dopamine and Acetylcholine Dynamics during Psychostimulant Sensitization.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral sensitization to repeated psychostimulant exposure is believed to contribute to the development of addiction. Nucleus accumbens (NAcc) dopamine (DA) is known to be a key substrate in sensitization, though recent work suggests that striatal acetylcholine (ACh) may also play a critical role. However, underlying ACh changes and their relationship to DA signaling have not been characterized. Here, we used dual-color fiber photometry to simultaneously measure DA and ACh in the NAcc shell of mice across repeated injections of cocaine or amphetamine. Repeated exposure progressively elevated locomotor activity and increased slow extracellular DA while attenuating transient DA release. Psychostimulants reduced phasic ACh transient amplitude and frequency, an effect that sensitized with repeated injections. However, the temporal coupling of DA and ACh remained unchanged. To determine whether D2 receptors (D2Rs) on cholinergic interneurons (CINs) drive this effect, we generated CIN-selective D2R knockout (KO) mice. Surprisingly, KOs continued to show an acute decrease in ACh and intact DA-ACh correlations after psychostimulant administration. However, they failed to exhibit sensitization of either DA or ACh in response to repeated psychostimulant administration. Despite this lack of sensitization in underlying neuromodulator signaling, the KO mice nevertheless exhibited behavioral sensitization, though at a slower rate than wild-type. These findings suggest that neural sensitization to psychostimulants is dependent on D2R expressed on CINs, but that behavioral sensitization is not dependent on sensitization of these underlying signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.