ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Structural Insights into Kainate Receptor Desensitization.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kainate receptors (KARs), along with AMPA and NMDA receptors, belong to the ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) family and play critical roles in mediating excitatory neurotransmission throughout the central nervous system. KARs also regulate neurotransmitter release and modulate neuronal excitability and plasticity. Receptor desensitization plays a critical role in modulating the strength of synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. While KARs share overall structural similarity with AMPA receptors, the desensitized state of KARs differs strikingly from that of other iGluRs. Despite extensive studies on KARs, a fundamental question remains unsolved: why do KARs require large conformational changes upon desensitization, unlike other iGluRs? To address this, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of GluK2 with double cysteine mutations in non-desensitized, shallow-desensitized and deep-desensitized conformations. In the shallow-desensitized conformation, two cysteine crosslinks stabilize the receptors in a conformation that resembles the desensitized state of AMPA receptors. However, unlike the tightly closed pore observed in the deep-desensitized KAR and desensitized AMPAR conformations, the channel pore in the shallow-desensitized state remains incompletely closed. Patch-clamp recordings and fluctuation analysis suggest that this state remains ion-permeable, indicating that the lateral rotational movement of KAR ligand-binding domains (LBDs) is critical for complete channel closure and stabilization of the receptor in desensitization states. Together with the multiple conformations representing different degree of desensitization, our results define the unique mechanism and conformational dynamics of KAR desensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.