ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Ancestral proteins trace the emergence of substrate specificity and oligomerization within bacterial DEDDy dinucleases.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleases play a crucial role in bacterial physiology, influencing processes such as DNA repair, genome maintenance, and host-pathogen interactions. We recently identified a class of nucleases, diDNases, which are encoded on mobile genetic elements and homologous to the house-keeping nanoRNase C (NrnC). Despite their shared structural fold, diDNases and NrnC orthologs exhibit differences. DiDNases form dimers and preferably cleave DNA dinucleotides, whereas NrnC homologs assemble into octamers that do not discriminate between RNA or DNA dinucleotides. Here, we investigate the evolutionary divergence of these enzymes using ancestral sequence reconstruction. Our results show that both diDNases and NrnC orthologs originated from a dimeric ancestor with intermediate substrate preferences. Structural analyses of ancestral and extant dinucleases provide a molecular rational for how gradual changes in conformation gave rise to substrate preferences, oligomeric state, and catalytic efficiency of these related, yet distinct enzyme clades. These findings provide insights into how small structural modifications enable large-scale changes in molecular assembly and functional specialization harnessing a conserved protein fold. In addition, the preference of the early ancestors for DNA dinucleotides and preservation of this activity in all extant enzymes strongly argues for a biological function of DNA dinucleotides.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.