ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A non-canonical cGAS-STING pathway drives cellular and organismal aging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulation of cytosolic DNA has emerged as a hallmark of aging, inducing sterile inflammation. STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) protein translates the sensing of cytosolic DNA by cGAS (cyclic-GMP-AMP synthase) into an inflammatory response. However, the molecular mechanisms whereby cytosolic DNA-induced cGAS-STING pathway leads to aging remain poorly understood. We show that STING does not follow the canonical pathway of activation in human fibroblasts passaged (aging) in culture, senescent fibroblasts, or progeria fibroblasts (from Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome patients). Despite cytosolic DNA buildup, features of the canonical cGAS-STING pathway like increased cGAMP production, STING phosphorylation, and STING trafficking to perinuclear compartment are not observed in progeria/senescent/aging fibroblasts. Instead, STING localizes at endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear envelope, and chromatin. Despite the non-conventional STING behavior, aging/senescent/progeria cells activate inflammatory programs such as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and the interferon (IFN) response, in a cGAS and STING-dependent manner, revealing a non-canonical pathway in aging. Importantly, progeria/aging/senescent cells are hindered in their ability to activate the canonical cGAS-STING pathway with synthetic DNA, compared to young cells. This deficiency is rescued by activating vitamin D receptor signaling, unveiling new mechanisms regulating the cGAS-STING pathway in aging. Significantly, in HGPS, inhibition of the non-canonical cGAS-STING pathway ameliorates cellular hallmarks of aging, reduces tissue degeneration, and extends the lifespan of progeria mice. Our study reveals that a new feature of aging is the progressively reduced ability to activate the canonical cGAS-STING pathway in response to cytosolic DNA, triggering instead a non-canonical pathway that drives senescence/aging phenotypes. Significance Statement: Our study provides novel insights into the mechanisms driving sterile inflammation in aging and progeria. We reveal a previously unrecognized characteristic of aging cells: the progressive loss of ability to activate the canonical response to foreign or self-DNA at the cytoplasm. Instead, aging, senescent, and progeria cells activate inflammatory programs via a non-conventional pathway driven by cGAS and the adaptor protein STING. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of the non-canonical cGAS-STING pathway ameliorates cellular, tissue and organismal decline in a devastating accelerated aging disease (Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome), highlighting it as a promising therapeutic target for age-related pathologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.