Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235946›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

MRI-based habitat radiomics combined with vision transformer for identifying vulnerable intracranial atherosclerotic plaques and predicting stroke events: a multicenter, retrospective study.

Yu Gao, Ziang Li, Xiaoyang Zhai, Gang Zhang, Lan Zhang, Tingting Huang, Lin Han, Jie Wang, Ruifang Yan, Yongdong Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A radiomics-based approach with automated segmentation for identifying symptomatic basilar artery plaques in acute stroke.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yu GaoDepartment of MRI Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Ziang LiDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Xiaoyang ZhaiDepartment of MRI Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Gang ZhangDepartment of MRI Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Lan ZhangDepartment of MRI Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Tingting HuangDepartment of MRI Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Lin HanDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Ruifang YanDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Yongdong LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
HongLing ZhaoDepartment of Neurology Center, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xin Xiang, China.
Qiuyi ZhaoThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, ZhengZhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengqi WeiDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Beichen XieDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Yancong SunDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Jianhua ZhaoDepartment of Neurology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.
Hongkai CuiDepartment of Radiology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xin Xiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate identification of high-risk vulnerable plaques and assessment of stroke risk are crucial for clinical decision-making, yet reliable non-invasive predictive tools are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model based on high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) to assist in the identification of vulnerable plaques and prediction of stroke recurrence risk in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). Methods: Between June 2018 and June 2024, a retrospective collection of HR-VWI images from 1806 plaques in 726 sICAS patients across four medical institutions was conducted. K-means clustering was applied to the T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T1-weighted imaging with contrast enhancement (T1CE) sequences. Following feature extraction and selection, radiomic models and habitat models were constructed. Additionally, the Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture was utilized for HR-VWI image analysis to build a deep learning model. A stacking fusion strategy was employed to integrate the habitat model and ViT model, enabling effective identification of high-risk vulnerable plaques in the intracranial region and prediction of stroke recurrence risk. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and model comparisons were conducted using the DeLong test. Furthermore, decision curve analysis and calibration curves were utilized to assess the practicality and clinical value of the model. Findings: The fused Habitat + ViT model exhibited excellent performance in both the validation and test sets. In the validation set, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.927-0.969), with a sensitivity of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.840-0.945), a specificity of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.842-0.949), and an accuracy of 0.897 (95% CI: 0.870-0.926). In the test set, the AUC increased to 0.960 (95% CI: 0.941-0.973), with specificity rising to 0.963 and an accuracy of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.857-0.913). The DeLong test revealed statistically significant differences in AUC between the fused model and the single-modal models (test set, vs. ViT p = 0.000; vs. Habitat p = 0.000) Cox regression analysis showed that the Habitat + ViT index, based on the prediction probability of the Habitat + ViT model, was an independent predictor of stroke recurrence (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.12-3.81), with significant predictive power for stroke events at multiple time points. Specifically, measured by AUC values, the model's predictive performance at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 0.751 (95% CI: 0.679-0.823), 0.820 (95% CI: 0.760-0.876), 0.815 (95% CI: 0.753-0.877), and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.680-0.873), respectively. Interpretation: The integrated Habitat + ViT model based on HR-VWI demonstrated superior performance in identifying high-risk vulnerable plaques in sICAS patients and predicting stroke recurrence risk, providing valuable support for clinical decision-making. Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 82204933). Henan Key Laboratory of Neurorestoratology (HNSJXF-2021-004), 2019 Joint Construction Project of Henan Provincial Health Committee and Ministry of Health (SB201901061), and the Xin Xiang City Acute Ischemic Stroke Precision Prevention and Treatment Key Laboratory.

Indexed as

HabitatHigh-risk plaqueStrokeVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID40235946
PMCPMC11999680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.