ArticleJPRAS open2025
Sequential Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sequential free flaps are often utilized for complex defects, particularly for recurrent head and neck tumors. However, their application in lower extremity (LE) reconstruction following trauma or oncology is less common. This study evaluated the indications, flap survival rates, and complications of sequential free flaps utilized in LE reconstruction. Methods: Data from our multicenter database spanning from 2002 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively through chart review. Adult patients who underwent sequential free flaps to the LE without complete initial flap loss were included. Outcome measures included ultimate flap viability and complications associated with sequential reconstructions. Results: A total of 6 patients were identified: 2 patients (33%) required a second reconstruction following trauma, 1 patient (17%) following tumor recurrence, and 3 patients (50%) for chronic wounds related to infection. Most second free flaps survived (83%), with the exception of one in which the patient ultimately underwent a transfemoral amputation. Complications were observed in 3 patients (50%). Conclusion: The main indication for second free flap reconstruction in the LE is the failure of durable wound closure with the first reconstruction, despite the absence of flap loss. In these complex scenarios, it is often prudent to utilize preoperative vascular imaging and to use distinct recipient vessels from those used in the first flap. Overall, sequential free flaps can be used in complex cases of limb salvage; however, they are associated with a substantial risk of complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic-IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.