ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging is superior to arterial spin labeling in detecting renal allograft fibrosis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capability of arterial spin labeling combined with morphological characteristics to distinguish early- and mid-stage chronic kidney disease: a prospective study on 5 T MRI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: an effective imaging technique for early-stage kidney injury in patients with type 2 diabetes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Advances in pediatric kidney diffusion tensor imaging: diagnostic and functional applications.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Prospective evaluation of arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor imaging-magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Advancements in the non-invasive diagnosis of renal fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although both magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) have been demonstrated to be useful for the assessment of renal allograft fibrosis, their diagnostic value for renal allograft fibrosis is rarely compared. In this study, we collected a relatively large sample size to compare the value of DTI and ASL in the assessment of renal transplantation (RT) fibrosis. Methods: This study included 141 kidney transplant recipients who underwent DTI, ASL, and biopsy. The renal allograft fibrosis was divided into ci0, ci1, ci2, and ci3 fibrosis groups according to the biopsy results. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and renal blood flow (RBF) were calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters between different fibrosis subgroups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance. Results: The medullary FA values in ci2 (0.27±0.04, P<0.001) and ci3 (0.21±0.03, P<0.001) groups were significantly lower than those in ci0 group (0.31±0.05). The medullary FA value in ci3 group (0.21±0.03) was significantly lower than that in ci1 group (0.30±0.07, P<0.001) and ci2 group (0.27±0.04, P<0.01). The AUC of DTI was found to be higher than that of ASL in accurately identifying renal allograft fibrosis, and the result was statistically significant in differentiating ci0-2 group and ci3 group (ci0 Conclusions: DTI has a higher diagnostic value than ASL in noninvasive identification of the degree of renal allograft fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.