Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235789›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for the invasiveness assessment of ground-glass nodules with fine segmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei Wu, Chen Gao, Linyu Wu, Chuan Gao, Jiaying Li, Zihang Su, Haoyu Zhong, Maosheng Xu, Zhichao Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei Wu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Chen Gao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Linyu WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Chuan GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Jiaying LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Zihang SuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Haoyu ZhongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Maosheng XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Zhichao SunDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-5593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate recognition of invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC) presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) is crucial for guiding clinical decision-making and timely surgical intervention. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning (DL) models via fine nodule segmentation in assessing the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Literature from the inception of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was searched. Studies related to DL and nodule segmentation in diagnosing IAC were evaluated and included. Titles and abstracts were screened, and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess the quality of the selected studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria of diagnostic tests were used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Eight studies involving 5,281 nodules and 4,676 patients were included and analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity of DL for the diagnosis of IAC was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.87], while the specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), but the overall quality of the evidence was suboptimal. Conclusions: DL and nodule segmentation demonstrated high accuracy in assessing lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness, but the certainty of the associated evidence was low. More large-scale, multicenter, high-quality diagnostic accuracy studies are needed to validate the performance and usefulness of DL in the assessment of lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)computed tomography (CT)deep learning (DL)invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC)pulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID40235789
PMCPMC11994546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.