ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
A study on indirect tumor localization using lung phantom during radiation therapy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate tumor localization is crucial in radiation therapy to ensure precise dose delivery and minimize damage to healthy tissues. This study introduces a novel thoracoabdominal phantom designed for predicting tumor positions in radiotherapy. The phantom incorporates the use of mask region-based convolutional neural networks (Mask R-CNN) ultrasound image tracking algorithm (M-UITA) in conjunction with 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) to establish and refine a tumor motion conversion model. Methods: Respiratory Motion Simulation System (RMSS) along with 4DCT was used to track the motion trajectories of the tumor phantom in both the superior-inferior (SI) and medial-lateral (ML) directions, with amplitudes ranging from 30-40 mm. Simultaneously, M-UITA was used to track the motion trajectory of the diaphragm phantom in the SI direction to establish a conversion model to derive the motion of the tumor from the motion of the diaphragm. Subsequently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used for the verification of the tumor phantom conversion position error. Results: The results indicated that the absolute error between the estimated and actual motion trajectories of the tumor phantom ranged from 0.35 to 1.35 mm in the SI direction and from 0.73 to 2.26 mm in the ML direction. Conclusions: This study has redesigned the thoracoabdominal phantom and refined the conversion model. In comparison to previous research, errors in both the SI and ML directions have been reduced. In the future, it can be integrated with a respiratory motion compensation system to minimize radiation dose damage to normal tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.