ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
A novel localization technique for margin distance assessment of deep-seated small pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic wedge resection: a retrospective study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic wedge resection of deep-seated small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) with an adequate surgical margin distance is a challenging yet crucial aspect of successful resection. In our previous study, we introduced a novel localization technique for SPN wedge resection with sufficient margin distance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate margin distance assessment of this localization technique for deep-seated SPNs in wedge resection by standardizing the surgical procedures. Methods: From November 2021 to October 2023, 73 patients with deep-seated SPNs who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided localization followed by thoracoscopic wedge resection were enrolled. A device characterized by a 4-hook claw and a tri-colored suture with a scale was utilized for localization. Clinical data were collected to evaluate the efficiency of the procedure in obtaining a sufficient margin distance for deep-seated SPN wedge resection. Results: A total of 73 patients were included. The median size of the nodules was 10.7 mm (range, 5-23 mm), and the median nodule depth was 25.3 mm (range, 20-49 mm). Needle localization was successful without dislodgment in 68 of the 73 patients (93.2%), and all nodules were completely wedge resected. No complications from localization required further medical intervention. The median resection margin distance was 14.4 mm (range, 4-29 mm), and the resection margin distance was more than 5 mm in 72 of the 73 cases (98.6%). A total of 62 of the 73 cases (84.9%) had a margin distance to tumor size ratio of ≥1. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that CT-guided 4-hook needle with scaled suture localization for deep-seated SPNs, followed by wedge resection, is an efficient method. Furthermore, it is beneficial in obtaining adequate margin distances for wedge resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.