ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Detecting keypoints with semantic labels on skull point cloud for plastic surgery.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Using deep learning models to automatically generate reference keypoints with surgical semantic labels and segment bone blocks in plastic surgery provides valuable preoperative planning references. This study aimed to develop a robust and precise keypoint detection framework for dense three-dimensional (3D) skull point clouds to assist in plastic surgery. Methods: A keypoint descriptor-detector framework was proposed to address keypoint detection in dense point cloud models for facial plastic surgery. The keypoint descriptor identified potential keypoint areas on the point cloud model using the PointRes2Net module to initialize keypoints, which were further optimized by a keypoint detector constructing a self-organized map. Based on the detected keypoints, a new localized small-part segmentation strategy for dense point cloud models was introduced. A bounding box was generated by the detected keypoints, enclosing small bone blocks as the region of interest (ROI) for segmentation. Results: The mean squared error (MSE) between the keypoints detected on the point cloud using this framework and the ground truth has been reduced to 3.35 mm on the skull models with an average size of 231 mm × 173 mm × 151 mm, outperforming existing point cloud keypoint detection algorithms without requiring additional keypoint annotation on two-dimensional (2D) images for auxiliary training. Furthermore, the proposed framework's segmentation strategy demonstrated a 22.69% improvement in average precision compared to direct segmentation, with a 34.15% improvement in precision for smaller parts. Conclusions: The proposed method accurately detects keypoints with surgical semantic labels on dense medical point clouds. Both keypoint detection and segmentation results align closely with the ground truth, providing valuable references for preoperative planning in plastic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.