ArticleBiofilm2025
Bacterial cellulose: Enhancing productivity and material properties through repeated harvest.
Article in Biofilm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Cellulose for Sustainable Food Packaging: Production Pathways, Structural Design, and Functional Modification Strategies.Polymers · 2025Review
- Microbial Valorization of Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Waste into Bacterial Cellulose: Innovations for Circular Bioeconomy Integration.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Multiomics analysis of the Silkworm cocoon shell.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Transcriptional reprogramming of Novacetimonas hansenii SI1 during growth on glycerol.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Bacterial cellulose scaffolds derived from brewing waste for cultivated meat applications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose (BC), a promising versatile biopolymer produced by bacteria, has an immense potential in various industries. However, large-scale application is hindered by high production costs and low yields. This study introduces an innovative approach combining a prolonged static culturing with intermittent harvesting. This novel strategy resulted in a significant increase in BC productivity, achieving up to a threefold rise in biomass within the first 35 days. Prolonged growth and continuous harvesting not only enhanced productivity but also led to a mutant strain M2 with higher yields and distinct BC architecture. Mechanical and structural analyses revealed that sequential harvest correlated with increasing crystallinity, altered crystallite sizes, and improved stiffness of the dry material during initial cycles, potentially reflecting bacteria adaptation to resources limitations. Genomic analysis identified key mutations in the M2 strain, including one in the RelA/SpoT enzyme, suggesting a reduced stringent response that promotes growth under nutrient-limiting conditions. Untargeted metabolomic profiling revealed deregulation of several metabolites, including a significant difference in fatty acid metabolites that could potentially influence membrane fluidity and BC secretion. Such metabolic and structural adaptations enhance BC production efficiency and material properties. These findings highlight the potential of intermittent harvesting for sustainable BC production and the role of bacterial adaptation in tuning BC properties. Further research will optimize this strategy and expand its applications in developing tailored biomaterials for diverse industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.