Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235656›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Primary solitary pituitary stalk abscess: case report and review.

Yuehui Ma, Linghao Bu, Jing Jin

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuehui MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Linghao BuDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jing JinDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pituitary stalk (PS) abscess has not been previously reported. In this study, we report a case of PS abscess presenting with central diabetes insipidus (CDI), hypopituitarism, hyperprolactinemia, and blurred vision. We highlight radiological clues and pathological biopsy findings to clarify the diagnosis and review the literature. Case presentation: A 67-year-old female presented with a > 3-month history of bitter and dry mouth, polyuria, blurred vision, fatigue, and poor appetite without inducement. Laboratory investigations revealed CDI, pituitary-thyroid, and pituitary-gonadal axis hypofunction, decreased insulin-like growth factor-1, and slightly elevated prolactin levels. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an isolated cystic, thickened PS with ring enhancement. The patient underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Direct observation during surgery revealed a PS abscess and pale-yellow pus. Histopathological evaluation showed PS tissue with inflammatory cell invasion and lymphocyte proliferation. The patient was treated with linezolid and ceftriaxone for 4 weeks post-surgery and levothyroxine, hydrocortisone, and desmopressin replacement therapy. MRI showed no signs of recurrence of the PS abscess 3 years post-surgery. Conclusion: This case reports a newly identified solitary PS lesions characterized by cystic PS thickening and ring enhancement on MRI, presenting with CDI, hyperprolactinemia, hypopituitarism, and blurred vision. The patient recovered uneventfully, and the postoperative MRI was normal without any recurrent lesions.

Indexed as

AbscessPituitary DiseasesPituitary GlandAgedDiabetes Insipidus, NeurogenicFemaleHumansHyperprolactinemiaHypopituitarismMagnetic Resonance Imagingabscessdiagnosispituitary stalkprimarysurgery

Identifiers

PMID40235656
PMCPMC11997081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.