ReviewFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2025
The effect of exercise on the adverse neonatal outcomes related to women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Walking through trimesters: a quantitative assessment of step counts before and during pregnancy and their impact on pregnancy outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Management and Prevention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lifestyle, Exercise, and Pharmacologic Interventions.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefits of prenatal exercise on neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception to September 9, 2023. ClinicalTrials.gov was also searched to ensure comprehensive coverage. We included studies that investigated the association between prenatal exercise and at least one adverse neonatal outcome of interest. A total of 4,268 publications were retrieved, and 3,060 records remained after removing duplicates. After screening abstracts, 107 studies were selected for full-text assessment, and ultimately, 17 articles (including 4 identified through manual searching) were included for data extraction. Extracted information included the first author, publication year, study design, geographical location, sample size, participants' demographic characteristics, intervention characteristics, and relevant outcome variables.Pooled results from random-effects models showed that prenatal exercise significantly reduced the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes, including: Cesarean delivery (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94), Premature birth (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27-0.90), Macrosomia (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.83), Fetal growth restriction (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08-0.52), and Birth trauma (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.54). Subgroup analyses indicated that single-component exercise programs were more effective than multi-component programs in reducing the risk of macrosomia (P = 0.06). In conclusion, prenatal exercise substantially reduces the risk of multiple adverse neonatal outcomes in women with GDM, including macrosomia, preterm birth, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction, and birth trauma. These findings highlight the outstanding benefits of antenatal exercise for fetal health, supporting its inclusion as a key component of prenatal care for women with GDM. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42023485375).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.