ReviewPreventive medicine reports2025
The effectiveness of school-based obesity prevention interventions on the health behaviours of children aged 6-18 years: A secondary data analysis of a systematic review.
Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food selection, cardiorespiratory fitness and the longitudinal association with adiposity among South African school children: the ExAMIN Youth SA study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Healthy Eating Initiatives in Australian Primary Schools: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- The longitudinal impact of individual and parental emotional factors and individual behavioral factors on weight and disordered eating: A scoping review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Obesity remains a contributor to the burden of disease globally. Suboptimal diet and physical inactivity are two rising risk factors of obesity in youth; both are targeted for obesity prevention. Further, these risk behaviours cluster and may be associated with other risks including smoking and alcohol intake. Few studies, however, have examined the extent to which interventions targeting obesity also impact on other health behaviours. The aim of this study is to synthesise the effects of child obesity prevention programs on diet, physical activity, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake, and to investigate differential effects by interventions that target different behaviours. Methods: A secondary data analysis of an existing systematic review was conducted. Literature searches identified any additional papers from 1990 to 2023 associated with the originally included studies. All papers were screened and were eligible if they reported any diet, physical activity, smoking or alcohol outcomes. Results for each health behaviour outcome were selected. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible to calculate standardised mean differences. Results: One hundred and four studies were eligible for inclusion. Fruit and vegetable intake (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.104; 95 % (CI) (0.03, 0.17)), and sugar-sweetened beverage intake (SMD -0.126; 95 % CI (-0.22, -0.04)) were positively impacted by obesity prevention, as were physical activity (SMD 0.168; 95 % CI (0.05, 0.28)) and sedentary behaviour (SMD -0.021; 95 % CI (-0.03, -0.01)). Findings were mixed for tobacco smoking and alcohol intake. Conclusion: Independent of weight status, school obesity prevention programs may improve some measures of child dietary intake and physical activity. Study registration: Prospectively registered: PROSPERO: CRD42021281106.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.