Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Developing electronic health records as a source of real-world data for veterinary pharmacoepidemiology.

Heather Davies, Peter-John Noble, Ivo S Fins, Gina Pinchbeck, David Singleton, Munir Pirmohamed, David Killick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather DaviesInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Peter-John NobleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ivo S FinsInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gina PinchbeckInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David SingletonInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Munir PirmohamedInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David KillickInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) by veterinary professionals and the public is the cornerstone of post-marketing safety surveillance for veterinary medicinal products (VMPs). However, studies suggest that most veterinary AEs remain unreported. Veterinary medicine regulators, including the United Kingdom Veterinary Medicines Directorate and the European Medicines Agency, have included the exploration of big data utilization to support pharmacovigilance efforts in their regulatory strategies. In this study, we describe the application of veterinary electronic healthcare records (EHRs) from the SAVSNET veterinary first opinion informatics system to conduct pharmacoepidemiological analyses. Five VMP-AE pairs were selected for investigation in a proof-of-concept study, where drug exposure was identified from semi-structured treatment data and AEs from the unstructured free-text clinical narrative. Dictionaries were developed to identify AEs based on standard terminology. The precision of these dictionaries improved when they were expanded using word vectorization and expert opinion. A key strength of first-opinion EHR datasets is their ability to enable cohort studies and facilitate calculations of absolute incidence and relative risk. Thus, we demonstrate that unstructured free-text clinical narratives can be used to identify outcomes for veterinary pharmacoepidemiological studies and, consequently, support and expand pharmacovigilance efforts based on spontaneous AE reports.

Indexed as

adverse eventselectronic health recordspharmacoepidemiologyreal world datareal world evidencetext mining

Identifiers

PMID40235568
PMCPMC11996780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.