ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Developing electronic health records as a source of real-world data for veterinary pharmacoepidemiology.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) by veterinary professionals and the public is the cornerstone of post-marketing safety surveillance for veterinary medicinal products (VMPs). However, studies suggest that most veterinary AEs remain unreported. Veterinary medicine regulators, including the United Kingdom Veterinary Medicines Directorate and the European Medicines Agency, have included the exploration of big data utilization to support pharmacovigilance efforts in their regulatory strategies. In this study, we describe the application of veterinary electronic healthcare records (EHRs) from the SAVSNET veterinary first opinion informatics system to conduct pharmacoepidemiological analyses. Five VMP-AE pairs were selected for investigation in a proof-of-concept study, where drug exposure was identified from semi-structured treatment data and AEs from the unstructured free-text clinical narrative. Dictionaries were developed to identify AEs based on standard terminology. The precision of these dictionaries improved when they were expanded using word vectorization and expert opinion. A key strength of first-opinion EHR datasets is their ability to enable cohort studies and facilitate calculations of absolute incidence and relative risk. Thus, we demonstrate that unstructured free-text clinical narratives can be used to identify outcomes for veterinary pharmacoepidemiological studies and, consequently, support and expand pharmacovigilance efforts based on spontaneous AE reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.