ArticleResearch square2025
Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of genomic selection (GS) is advancing rapidly on many fronts including the utilization of multi-omics datasets with the goal to increase prediction ability (PA) and to become an integral part of an increasing number of breeding programs ensuring future food security. In this study, we used RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data to perform genomic prediction (GP) on three related barley RIL populations investigating the potential of increasing PA by combining genomic and transcriptomic datasets, adding whole genome sequencing (WGS) SNP data, functional parameter filtering, and empirical quality filtering. Our RNA-Seq data were generated cost-efficiently using small footprint plant cultivation, high-throughput RNA extraction, and library preparation miniaturization. We also examined the depth of the sequencing as an additional cost-saving measure. We used five-fold cross-validation to evaluate the PA of the gene expression dataset, the RNA-Seq SNP dataset, and the consensus SNP dataset between the RNA-Seq and parental WGS data, resulting in PAs between 0.73 and 0.78. The consensus SNP dataset performed best, with five out of eight traits performing significantly better compared to a 50K SNP array, which served as a benchmark. The advantage of the consensus SNP dataset was most prominent in the inter-population predictions, in which the training- and validation-set originated from different RIL sub-populations. We could therefore not only show that RNA-Seq data alone are able to predict various complex traits in barley using RIL, but also that the performance can be further increased by WGS data for which the public availability will steadily increase.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.