Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235459›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Something to sink your teeth into: the mechanics of tooth indentation in frugivorous fishes.

Jack Rosen, Karly Cohen, Cassandra M Donatelli, Adam Summers, Stephanie Crofts, Matthew Kolmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack RosenDepartment of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3809-8317
Karly CohenFriday Harbor Laboratories at University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cassandra M DonatelliSchool of Engineering and Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Adam SummersFriday Harbor Laboratories at University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephanie CroftsCollege of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Matthew KolmannDepartment of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation PRFB 1712015University of Louisville
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frugivorous vertebrates engage in a mutualism with fruiting plants: the former receive a nutrient subsidy, and the latter benefit by having their seeds dispersed far from parent plants. Vertebrate frugivores like primates and bats have particular morphologies suited for gripping fruit and then pulverizing fruit soft tissues; however, variation among frugivores and fruits has made the identification of common frugivore phenotypes difficult. Here, we evaluated the performance of frugivorous fish (pacu and piranha; Serrasalmidae) dentitions when puncturing fruits and seeds and compared specialist frugivorous species to facultative frugivorous and non-herbivorous relatives. We also explored how fruit characteristics affect puncture performance and how the indentation of fruit differs mechanically from harder foods like nuts. Based on expectations from studies on frugivorous bats and primates, we expected that frugivore dentitions would exhibit low force and then high work when engaging fruit tissues. Aligning with our expectation, the specialized frugivorous pacu,

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFishesFruitToothAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCharaciformesdurophagygranivoryichthyochoryseed dispersal

Identifiers

PMID40235459
PMCPMC12001085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.