ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025
The silent threat under the nail: Evaluation of Seymour fractures in pediatric patients.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seymour Fractures Revisited: Recognition and Management of an Open Physeal Distal Phalanx Injury.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to examine the diagnosis, treatment methods, and outcomes of Seymour fractures and to address diagnostic challenges in these fractures. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween January 2020 and November 2023, a total of 28 pediatric patients (18 males, 11 females; mean age: 6.8±4.5 years; range, 1 to 15 years) who presented with Seymour fractures within 24 h of injury were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated either conservatively in the emergency department or surgically in the operating room if closed reduction was unsuccessful. All patients received intravenous antibiotics within the first 24 h, followed by oral antibiotics after discharge. Infection rates, physeal arrest, and nail dystrophy were evaluated during follow-up.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 16.6±6.6 (range, 12 to 32) months. There was no statistically significant difference in the affected side (right/left) and fingers (p=0.43 and p>0.05, respectively). The complication rate was significantly higher in surgically treated patients compared to those treated conservatively (p=0.02 and p<0.05, respectively). Evaluation of patients based on finger mobility showed no motion loss in the conservatively treated group at the final follow-up. In the surgically treated group, however, motion restrictions were noted in only two patients. Early antibiotic administration within 24 h significantly reduced infection rates, with only 3.5% (n=1) of patients developing osteomyelitis.
conclusionStable Seymour fractures can be treated conservatively in the emergency setting, while complex cases may require surgical intervention in the operating room. Early antibiotic use is essential in minimizing infection risk. Antibiotherapy within the first 24 h after injury is an effective way to prevent infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.