ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025
Long-term outcomes of computer-assisted Ci™ navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of computer-assisted Ci™ navigation on clinical, radiological, and functional results versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween January 2005 and July 2011, a total of 85 patients (36 males, 49 females; mean age: 66.2±5.2 years; range, 59 to 84 years) who underwent P.F.C. Sigma™ knee system implantation using computer-assisted Ci™ navigation system (BrainLAB®, DePuy International, Leeds, UK) and completed a minimum follow-up of eight years were included in the study. In the control group, a total of 100 patients (40 males, 60 females; mean age: 68.3±3.9 years; range, 60 to 79 years) who completed a minimum follow-up of eight years were randomly selected from a dataset of implanted P.F.C. Sigma™ knee systems in the same period using Specialist® 2 instrumentation without navigation. An implant survival analysis was used to compare implant survivorship between the groups throughout 12 years. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Based on long-format X-ray images, the implant position in the frontal and sagittal planes was evaluated.
resultsThe ratio for navigation to control group survival is approximately 1.01 at 12 years. The clinical outcomes showed no significant difference between the groups (knee scores, p=0.707 and functional scores, p=0.485). In the measured angles analysis, we observed a consistent pattern in both groups. In the control group, there was a trend toward implanting the tibial component with slight varus alignment (p=0.038) and a higher posterior slope (p<0.001). On average, the operation was prolonged by 13 min in the navigated group (p<0.001).
conclusionIn conclusion, our study results demonstrate that while kinematic navigation in TKA improves the precision of implant alignment, it does not provide significant benefits in terms of long-term implant survival or functional outcomes compared to conventional TKA methods. The use of the computer-assisted Ci™ navigation system is associated with prolonged operation duration, although no technical complications related to the navigation device's software can be observed. Therefore, although navigation offers theoretical advantages in component positioning, its use may be more justifiable in cases with challenging alignment requirements rather than as a routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.