Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235194›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Effects of an Iso-Osmotic Chloride-Free Solution With High Strong Ion Difference vs. Ringer's Lactate on Non-Lactate Metabolic Acidosis in Dogs.

Roberto Rabozzi, Stefano Oricco

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roberto RabozziPoliclinico Veterinario Roma Sud, AniCura, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-538X
Stefano OriccoCentro Veterinario Imperiese, Imperia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-5060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic acidosis is a common acid-base disorder in critically ill dogs, with fluid therapy being a key but debated treatment. Sodium bicarbonate's risks have spurred interest in safer alternatives such as sodium lactate.

objectivesTo compare the efficacy of a chloride-free, high strong ion difference solution (H-SID) to Ringer's lactate (RL) for treating metabolic acidosis, hypothesizing the superiority of the H-SID solution. ANIMALS: Forty-six dogs with metabolic acidosis from two veterinary hospitals.

methodsProspective randomized multicenter study. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either RL or H-SID at infusion rates of 4 or 10 mL/kg/h for 4 h, based on their volume status. H-SID was compounded with sodium (145 mmol/L), lactate (145 mmol/L), potassium (10 mmol/L), and aspartate (10 mmol/L) in sterile water for injection.

resultsThe H-SID group showed a significant increase in BE-ecf (mmol/L) at infusion rates of 4 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001) and 10 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001) when compared to the RL group. At the lower infusion rate, the median increase was 4.1 mmol/L (95% CI: 3.37, 6.71), whereas the RL group exhibited a variation of -0.1 (95% CI: -0.75, 2.2). At the higher infusion rate, the median increase was 11 mmol/L (95% CI: 8.16, 12.52) compared to the RL group variation of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.96). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our results indicate a significant alkalizing effect of the H-SID solution in dogs with non-lactic metabolic acidosis, demonstrating a superior effect compared to the RL solution without notable adverse effects.

Indexed as

AcidosisDog DiseasesFluid TherapyRinger's LactateAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleProspective StudiesRinger's Lactateacid–basecanineelectrolytefluid therapyStewart approach

Identifiers

PMID40235194
PMCPMC12000541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.