ArticleJournal of athletic training2025
Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Progressive Walking Program after ACL Reconstruction: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextIndividuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) participate in less physical activity compared to uninjured peers. Physical activity in this population is important for both short and long-term health, particularly to reduce the risk of chronic conditions (eg, obesity, osteoarthritis).
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a walking program early after ACLR.
designExplanatory Mixed Methods Study.
settingTelehealth. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsTen individuals (60% female, mean age 20.2 ± 3.9 years old, mean BMI 22.6 ± 2.9 kg/m2 ) within 8 weeks of a unilateral ACLR.
interventionA 12-week personalized progressive walking program to increase daily steps utilizing weekly virtual visits with a physical therapist.
main outcome measuresQuantitative data included rates of appointment attendance, activity monitor wear compliance, adverse events, and achievement of daily step goals. Qualitative analysis of field notebooks collected throughout the intervention and semi-structured post intervention interviews were performed to explain the quantitative feasibility metrics using a case study approach.
resultsParticipants wore their activity monitor 92.3% of days, attended 94.2% of appointments, met their recommended physical activity goal 54.8% of days, and 50% of individuals reached their physical activity target at least 50% of weeks. No adverse events related to the walking program were reported. Program-level and participant-level themes that promoted successful physical activity goal achievement were identified.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated mixed feasibility and acceptability of a progressive walking program early after ACLR. Participants demonstrated high adherence to wearing an activity monitor and completing weekly virtual physical activity program sessions. However, daily physical activity goals were only met approximately half of the time. Clinicians and researchers can use the themes identified from the qualitative analysis in future program designs to promote physical activity after ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.