Observational studyJournal of oral rehabilitation2025
Exploring the Association Between Clinical Features and CBCT Findings in TMJ Degenerative Joint Disease.
Observational study in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demographic and structural indicators of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in asymptomatic adults: a cone-beam computed tomography-based multivariate analysis.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Cross-Sectional Assessment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction and Masticatory System Changes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation between MRI disc morphology and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a cross-sectional CBCT-MRI combined study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Radiographic evaluation of degenerative findings in the temporomandibular joint using CBCT: a prevalence-based study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular joint (TMJ) degenerative joint disease (DJD) involves progressive osseous changes and is commonly associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating these changes. However, the relationship between clinical signs and symptoms, such as TMJ clicking or pain and radiographic findings remains poorly understood. Clarifying these associations can refine imaging prescribing practices and improve patient-specific diagnostic strategies.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the association between clinical signs and symptoms of TMD and radiographic features of TMJ DJD detected on CBCT, emphasising its diagnostic value and limitations.
methodsA retrospective chart review of 98 patients (196 TMJs) was conducted at a university-based oral medicine clinic. Clinical signs, including TMJ clicking, muscle pain and joint pain, were documented and CBCT findings, such as osteophytes and erosions, were analysed. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.
resultsA significant association was identified between TMJ clicking and the presence of osteophytes (p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed between other clinical features, including muscle and joint pain and CBCT findings.
conclusionThe findings support an indication-driven approach to CBCT imaging, highlighting its diagnostic value in patients with specific clinical presentations, such as TMJ clicking, combined with additional clinical indicators. Routine CBCT imaging for all patients with TMD is not justified and future research should focus on refining imaging guidelines to ensure judicious use in TMJ diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.