ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Long-term trends in the clinical management and outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal cancer in Norway.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence trends of esophageal squamous cell and adenocarcinoma in Finland in 2000-2021.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeGastroesophageal cancers are highly prevalent internationally, with many patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, leading to challenging treatment and poor survival. This study uses real-world evidence from a population-level database to describe demographics, clinical characteristics, initial treatment patterns, and survival for patients with gastroesophageal cancer in Norway. MATERIAL AND
methodsIndividual patient data was sourced from the Cancer Registry of Norway for patients diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), and gastric cancer from 2001 to 2021, with follow-up from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Treatment patterns were captured from 2010 to 2022, defined as curative or palliative based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. RESULTS AND
interpretationThe cohort included 14,334 Norwegian patients with gastroesophageal cancer; predominantly male, mean age 69-73 years, with a median follow-up of 9-11 months across cancer subtypes. Approximately 40% of patients received curative treatment, and multi-modality treatments increased for EAC, GEJC, and ESCC. Median survival ranged from 6 to 11 months for patients treated palliatively, and 17-95 months for those treated with curative intent. Interestingly, median survival was higher for patients with EAC and GEJC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (86.1 and 75.1 months) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (49.1 and 42.1 months), which was confirmed by a multivariate Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, and disease stage. This study demonstrates that multimodal treatment strategies, consisting of chemotherapy and surgery, may be associated with improved survival outcomes for gastroesophageal cancers. Future studies are required to identify optimum treatment strategies for gastroesophageal cancer subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.