ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2025
Distinguishing cause from effect in psychological research: An independence-based approach under linear non-Gaussian models.
Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinguishing cause from effect in psychological research: An independence-based approach under linear non-Gaussian models.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing cause from effect - that is, determining whether x causes y (x → y) or, alternatively, whether y causes x (y → x) - is a primary research goal in many psychological research areas. Despite its importance, determining causal direction with observational data remains a difficult task. In this study, we introduce an independence-based approach for causal discovery between two variables of interest under a linear non-Gaussian model framework. We propose a two-step algorithm based on distance correlations that provides empirical conclusions on the causal directionality of effects under realistic conditions typically seen in psychological studies, that is, in the presence of hidden confounders. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Findings suggest that the algorithm can effectively detect the causal direction between two variables of interest, even in the presence of weak hidden confounders. Moreover, distance correlations provide useful insights into the magnitude of hidden confounding. We provide an empirical example to demonstrate the application of our proposed approach and discuss practical implications and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.