Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235052›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2025

Distinguishing cause from effect in psychological research: An independence-based approach under linear non-Gaussian models.

Dexin Shi, Bo Zhang, Wolfgang Wiedermann, Amanda J Fairchild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dexin ShiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-6756
Bo ZhangSchool of Labor and Employment Relations, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Wolfgang WiedermannDepartment of Educational School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6468-905X
Amanda J FairchildDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

ASPIRE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing cause from effect - that is, determining whether x causes y (x → y) or, alternatively, whether y causes x (y → x) - is a primary research goal in many psychological research areas. Despite its importance, determining causal direction with observational data remains a difficult task. In this study, we introduce an independence-based approach for causal discovery between two variables of interest under a linear non-Gaussian model framework. We propose a two-step algorithm based on distance correlations that provides empirical conclusions on the causal directionality of effects under realistic conditions typically seen in psychological studies, that is, in the presence of hidden confounders. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Findings suggest that the algorithm can effectively detect the causal direction between two variables of interest, even in the presence of weak hidden confounders. Moreover, distance correlations provide useful insights into the magnitude of hidden confounding. We provide an empirical example to demonstrate the application of our proposed approach and discuss practical implications and future directions.

Indexed as

CausalityModels, StatisticalPsychologyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLinear ModelsMonte Carlo MethodNormal DistributionResearch Designcausal discoverydirection dependence analysisdistance correlationslinear non‐Gaussian modelsreverse causation

Identifiers

PMID40235052
PMCPMC12516111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.