Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235039›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025

Primary Care and Linked Secondary Care Encounters for Foot and Ankle Problems in Children and Young People: A Population-Based Cohort Study in England.

Emma Rezel-Potts, Catherine Bowen, Kate M Dunn, Christopher I Jones, Martin C Gulliford, Stewart C Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma Rezel-PottsSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-792X
Catherine BowenFaculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-9515
Kate M DunnCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-2606
Christopher I JonesDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-1157
Martin C GullifordSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-9075
Stewart C MorrisonSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-0903

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR203518Research for Patient Benefit Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United Kingdom, foot and ankle problems in children and young people are typically seen by the general practitioner in primary care and referred to secondary care or community services for specialist assessment and intervention. Following initial presentation to primary care, we have described the secondary care services accessed by children and young people with foot and ankle problems. We have also explored the sociodemographic variables associated with referrals to secondary care.

methodThis was a population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum primary care database and linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Outpatient database. We extracted data for all children and young people up to 18 years of age with a consultation for a foot and ankle problem from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2021 (CPRD) and included those with linked data in secondary care (HES database) in our analyses.

results346,454 children and young people aged 0-18 years were identified in CPRD and eligible for linkage; 5030 had at least one referral within 18 weeks. The most common reason for referral was musculoskeletal or unspecified pain and 2935 had a referral to trauma and orthopaedics, 1314 for paediatric services, 678 for physiotherapy and 274 for diagnostic imaging. Odds for referrals were higher among younger age groups (odds ratio (OR) 1.29 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.33). Those in other (OR 0.77 and 95%CI 0.72-0.82), Asian (OR 0.81 and 95%CI 0.77-0.86) and Black (OR 0.85 and 95%CI 0.8-0.91) ethnic groups had lower odds of referral compared to those in the White group.

conclusionThese findings represent the first analyses of secondary care referrals for children and young people with foot and ankle problems. We have identified that musculoskeletal symptoms were most common reason for referral and the most common speciality involved in assessing foot and ankle problems was trauma and orthopaedics. We have reported sociodemographic differences in secondary care referrals and these findings could be indicative of inequalities in access to care and should be a priority for further research.

Indexed as

Foot DiseasesPrimary Health CareSecondary Health CareAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleReferral and Consultationadolescentanklechildfootgeneral practitionershospitalssecondary care

Identifiers

PMID40235039
PMCPMC11999890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.