ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Enhanced associations between subjective cognitive concerns and blood-based AD biomarkers using a novel EMA approach.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-intensity and blackout drinking impact on next-day cognitive functioning among college-attending young adults.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
- Rewarding Work and Memory Perceptions: Evidence Among Older Workers in the Health and Retirement Study.Safety and health at work · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Associations of Job Demand-Control Characteristics With Objective and Subjective Cognitive Outcomes in Older Workers: The Health and Retirement Study.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSubjective cognitive concerns (SCC) have emerged as important early indicators of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Traditional measures of SCC rely on recall-based assessments, which may be limited in capturing real-time fluctuations in cognitive concerns. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) offers a promising alternative by providing real-time data. This study aimed to link SCC assessed via EMA and traditional measures with blood-based AD biomarkers in a diverse, dementia-free, community-based sample based in the Bronx, NY.
methodsEinstein Aging Study (EAS) participants underwent in-person, recall-based assessments of SCC during an in-clinic visit. Additionally, EMA SCC assessments were collected once per day over two weeks. Linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationships between SCC variables and plasma biomarkers adjusted for demographics and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) status.
resultsIn N = 254 participants, EMA-reported SCCs demonstrated significant associations with AD biomarkers, particularly p-tau181 (β = 0.21, p = 0.001). Further, significant associations remain across both cognitive (cognitively unimpaired vs. MCI) and racial groups. In contrast, traditional SCC measures exhibited limited associations with these biomarkers. The findings highlight the added value of EMA in capturing SCCs that could indicate early ADRD risk.
conclusionsEMA provides a more dynamic and potentially sensitive method for detecting early AD risk compared to traditional SCC assessments. These real-time measures could enhance early detection and clinical intervention, particularly in diverse and under-resourced populations. This study underscores the potential of EMA for broad applicability and inclusivity in monitoring AD progression and facilitating early therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.