ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends in radiation dermatitis in the past twenty years.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) analysis of artificial intelligence for thyroid nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- A bibliometric analysis of advances in N6‑methyladenosine research in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to explore the most influential countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and trends in the study of the mechanism and treatments of radiation dermatitis (RD) from 2003 to 2023 using bibliometric analysis.
methodsThe literature associated with RD was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, only articles and reviews in English were included. Individual articles were reviewed to identify the authorship, published journal, journal impact factor, institution and country of origin, and year of publication.
resultsA total of 6,453 authors from 1,605 institutions in 64 countries/regions published 1,062 RD-related literature. The United States was the most productive country. The Unicancer in France was the institution that published the majority of articles on RD. Edward Chow was the most productive author and Supportive Care in Cancer contributed the most articles. Advanced head and neck cancer is the most common cause of RD. The mechanism research mainly focused on nitric oxide, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in recent years, and Mepitel film, Mepilex Lite, and PBMT were the main preventive and therapeutic measures for RD.
conclusionOur bibliometric studies provide a thorough overview of RD and valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this discipline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.