ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
CRISP: A causal relationships-guided deep learning framework for advanced ICU mortality prediction.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation does not equal causation: the imperative of causal inference in machine learning models for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-Guided Multimodal Risk Prediction Framework for Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Using EHR and CT Imaging for COVID-19 Clinical Decision Support.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting ICU in-hospital mortality from text-encoded structured EHR data using adaptive transformer layer fusion.iScience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMortality prediction is critical in clinical care, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs), where early identification of high-risk patients can inform treatment decisions. While deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated significant potential in this task, most suffer from limited generalizability, which hinders their widespread clinical application. Additionally, the class imbalance in electronic health records (EHRs) complicates model training. This study aims to develop a causally-informed prediction model that incorporates underlying causal relationships to mitigate class imbalance, enabling more stable mortality predictions.
methodsThis study introduces the CRISP model (Causal Relationship Informed Superior Prediction), which leverages native counterfactuals to augment the minority class and constructs patient representations by incorporating causal structures to enhance mortality prediction. Patient data were obtained from the public MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases, as well as an additional dataset from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University (WCHSU).
resultsA total of 69,190 ICU cases were included, with 30,844 cases from MIMIC-III, 27,362 cases from MIMIC-IV, and 10,984 cases from WCHSU. The CRISP model demonstrated stable performance in mortality prediction across the 3 datasets, achieving AUROC (0.9042-0.9480) and AUPRC (0.4771-0.7611). CRISP's data augmentation module showed predictive performance comparable to commonly used interpolation-based oversampling techniques.
conclusionCRISP achieves better generalizability across different patient groups, compared to various baseline algorithms, thereby enhancing the practical application of DL in clinical decision support.
trial registrationTrial registration information for the WCHSU data is available on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry website ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ), with the registration number ChiCTR1900025160. The recruitment period for the data was from August 5, 2019, to August 31, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.