Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234901›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Developing a crisis leadership evaluation system for Chinese nursing staff during major infectious disease emergencies: a modified Delphi study.

Changchang Chen, Xutong Zheng, Man Zhang, Luxi Zhang, Wenjie Chen, Shizhe He, Hezi Mu, Xuejun Hu, Hongjuan Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Changchang Chen *Department of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, No. 169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xutong Zheng *School of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Man ZhangIntensive Care Unit, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Luxi ZhangHarbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Wenjie ChenSchool of Pharmacy, Yichun University, Yichun, Jiangxi, China.
Shizhe HeDepartment of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, No. 169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Hezi MuDepartment of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, No. 169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xuejun HuDepartment of Health Services, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. hu-xuejun@hotmail.com.
Hongjuan LangDepartment of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, No. 169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China. langhj@fmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Army Nursing Innovation and Cultivation Special Project 2023HL008Scientific and Technological Research Project on Major Issues in Military and Aviation Medicine 2023JSYX19Shaanxi Provincial Key R&D Project 2024SF-YBXM-666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo create a consensus on the nursing crisis leadership evaluation system during major infectious disease emergencies.

backgroundCrisis leadership is critical to prevent and mitigate an infectious disease infectious disease public health emergency during crisis time. However, there has been no crisis leadership evaluation system for nursing staff during major infectious diseases emergencies in China.

methodsWe used a two-part modified Delphi method. Part 1 focused on creating a pool of indicators and developing an evaluation framework through a systematic literature review and a qualitative interview. Part 2 revised the indicators and built the final the evaluation system using two rounds of the Delphi surveys, following the Conducting and REporting of DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidance. Indicators were scored by a panel of experts based on the 5-point Likert scale. The weights of the indicators at each level were identified by analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods.

resultsA consensus was reached on a framework for assessing crisis leadership in nursing. Experts who met the inclusion criteria participated in round 1 (n = 23) and 2 (n = 19). The recovery rates for the two rounds of the Delphi survey were 92% and 82%. The authority coefficients (Cr) were 0.88 and 0.93, respectively, indicating the high reliability of the consultation results. The Kendall coefficients (W) of the two rounds were 0.106 and 0.150 (P < 0.001). The final consensus set comprised 6 primary indicators, 18 secondary indicators, and 38 tertiary indicators. The Weights of the six primary indicators allocated by AHP, namely loading the responsibility, heading the team, governing the situation, foreseeing the crisis, thriving on crisis, and insisting on the faith, were 0.3056, 0.2500, 0.1944, 0.1389, 0.0833, and 0.0278.

conclusionA consensus-based, contemporary set of nursing crisis leadership evaluation systems in the context of major infectious disease emergencies has been identified. Ongoing work is needed to further develop a highly reliable scale, determine the current state of nursing crisis leadership, construct a targeted training curriculum, and implement the program into practice that managers may wish to use to assess, select, and develop the next generation of nursing leaders.

Indexed as

Crisis leadershipDelphiEvaluation systemInfectious diseaseNursingPandemicPublic health emergencies

Identifiers

PMID40234901
PMCPMC12312600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.