Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234891›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Decentralising healthcare for diabetes and hypertension from secondary to primary level in a humanitarian setting in Kurdistan, Iraq: a qualitative study.

Éimhín Ansbro, Benjamin Schmid, Ruth Willis, Karwan M-Amen, Kazhan Mahmood, Idrees Abdulkareem, Signe Frederiksen, Jytte Roswall, Sigiriya Aebischer Perone, Bayard Roberts and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Éimhín AnsbroDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, LSHTM, London, UK. eimhin.ansbro@lshtm.ac.uk.
Benjamin SchmidDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, LSHTM, London, UK.
Ruth WillisDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, LSHTM, London, UK.
Karwan M-AmenCollege of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Kazhan MahmoodCollege of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Idrees AbdulkareemInternational Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.
Signe FrederiksenDanish Red Cross, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jytte RoswallDanish Red Cross, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sigiriya Aebischer PeroneInternational Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bayard RobertsDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, LSHTM, London, UK.
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nazar Shabila *College of Health Sciences, Catholic University in Erbil, Erbil, Iraq.
Pablo Perel *Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, LSHTM, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperts suggest that Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) care is best delivered at the primary level, including in humanitarian crisis settings. In many crisis-affected countries, NCD care is predominantly delivered by specialists at secondary care level, and there is limited evidence on decentralising NCD care in such settings. We aimed to explore health actor and patient experiences of decentralising diabetes and hypertension (DM/HTN) care from a hospital to primary care clinics in the humanitarian setting of Duhok, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a qualitative study including 30 semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients (n = 16), healthcare providers (n = 7), and key stakeholders (n = 7) involved in the decentralisation project. Guided by a conceptual framework, data were analysed thematically using deductive and inductive approaches. The decentralisation project achieved its stated goals of (a) increasing patients' access to DM/HTN care, by reducing cost and distance, and (b) decreasing workload at secondary care level. The approach appeared acceptable from patient, provider and stakeholder perspectives. Key health system inputs were put in place to support the decentralisation project, including medicines, equipment and health workforce training, but gaps remained. While access and quality seemed to improve, integration, continuity and sustainability were more challenging to achieve. Key systemic challenges to sustainability included a lack of health financing, and weak national supply chains and information systems. Patients' trust in the service was important and was closely linked to having access to a continuous supply of trusted medications.

conclusionsWhile it is possible to decentralise diabetes and hypertension care from secondary to primary level in a humanitarian setting, multiple contextual factors must be considered, including supply chain strengthening and adaptation to existing workforce capacity. Our study findings may inform other actors exploring the decentralisation of NCD care elsewhere in Iraq and in other humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

AltruismDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusHypertensionPoliticsPrimary Health CareSecondary Health CareAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicIraqMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchConflictDecentralisationDiabetesHumanitarianHypertensionInternally displaced personIraqKurdistanNon-communicable diseasePatient perspectivePrimary careQualitativeRefugee

Identifiers

PMID40234891
PMCPMC11998334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.