Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234883›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Exploring the magnitude and predictors of the long-term psychological impact of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers in Vietnam: a multi-center, cross-sectional study.

Hong Trang Nguyen, Bich Thuy Duong, Thinh Toan Vu, Sophia Lin, Tri Nugraha Susilawati, Ba Tam Nguyen, Minh Cuong Duong

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hong Trang NguyenFaculty of Nursing, Phenikaa University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bich Thuy DuongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, FV Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thinh Toan VuCenter for Innovation in Mental Health, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, USA.
Sophia LinSchool of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tri Nugraha SusilawatiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
Ba Tam NguyenFaculty of Nursing, Phenikaa University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Minh Cuong DuongSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2033, Australia. minh.duong@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-0047

Funding

Australian Alumni Grants Fund AAGF-R4-00090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detrimental impacts of COVID-19 on the mental well-being of frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) have been well studied. However, the long-term trajectory of their mental well-being remains relatively unexplored. We examined the magnitude and predictors of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on frontline HCWs during the transition into the "new normal" phase.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was performed on frontline HCWs at two largest designated COVID-19 hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City between May and November 2022. A self-administered questionnaire captured participants' demographic characteristics and psychological distress including depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with psychological distress.

resultsAmong 462 HCWs, 85.3% self-reported having good, very good, or excellent mental health before their COVID-19 deployment, compared to 40.7% during the deployment and 55.6% at the time of the study. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe depression was 26.8%, anxiety (20.8%), insomnia (23.4%), and overall psychological distress (73.2%). Predictors for depression included pre-existing physical (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.09, 95%CI 1.03-4.22, P = 0.04) and mental health (aOR = 3.59, 95%CI 1.31-9.84, P = 0.01) conditions and being deployed during the 3rd (aOR = 6.28, 95%CI 1.12-35.08, P = 0.04) and 4th (aOR = 5.01, 95%CI 1.08-23.16, P = 0.04) COVID-19 wave. Those with mental health conditions before the deployment (aOR = 3.95, 95%CI 1.42-11.0, P = 0.008) were more likely to report anxiety symptoms. Predictors for insomnia included physical health conditions before the deployment (aOR = 2.73, 95%CI 1.37-5.44, P = 0.004), working at field hospitals (aOR = 2.44, 95%CI 1.43-4.16, P = 0.001), and currently being deployed to respond to COVID-19 (aOR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.67, P = 0.001).

conclusionsGiven the substantial impact of COVID-19 deployment on HCWs' long-term mental well-being, comprehensive mental health support strategies are urgently needed. As HCWs may overlook their mental health issues, a screening program with psychological support services should accompany them early in future pandemics. Further nationwide studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to understand the full extent of psychological distress among frontline HCWs in Vietnam.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPrevalencePsychological DistressSARS-CoV-2Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionFrontline healthcare workersInsomnia

Identifiers

PMID40234883
PMCPMC12001647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.