ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Impact of early infectious diseases consultation on the management of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a propensity score weighting retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important healthcare-associated infection, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to investigate the impact of early infectious disease consultation (IDC) on the quality of care metrics of CLABSI in patients admitted to the ICU.
methodsPatients with CLABSI admitted to the ICU were included and divided into early IDC, and late or never IDC groups. The early IDC group indicated patients whose attending physician received IDC within 72 h of CLABSI onset. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients who received optimal targeted antibiotic treatment and catheter removal within 72 h of CLABSI onset. Propensity score analysis with the inverse probability of the treatment weighting method was used to compare the outcomes.
resultsAmong the 197 enrolled patients, 52 (26.4%) underwent early IDC and 145 (63.6%) did not. The early IDC group showed considerably higher proportions of catheter removal (76.9% versus 44.8%; adjusted odds ratio (OR): 3.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72-7.98; P = 0.001) than the late or never IDC group. The proportions of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotic treatment were significantly higher in the early IDC group than in the late or never IDC group (67.3% versus 46.9%, adjusted OR: adjusted OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.17-4.91, P = 0.016)).
conclusionsEarly IDC was associated with improvement of the quality of care for patients with CLABSI in the ICU. This findings support the implementation of early IDC should be considered as an integral part of care of CLABSI in ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.