ArticleBMC medical education2025
The interplay between research expectations and perceived barriers: a mediation analysis among Chinese medical undergraduates.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical research barriers, facilitators, and motives in a developing country: a mixed-methods single-centre study.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Students' competencies in Problem-Based Learning influence evaluation of tutors.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScientific research activity is essential to drive undergraduate medical education innovation, but many barriers prevent students from participating in research activities. While many studies have identified these challenges, the psychological factors, such as research expectations and interest, influencing students' perceptions of these barriers have been less explored. This study intends to explore these barriers and how research expectations, through interest, influence student engagement in research.
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved 322 medical students from Shandong University. The majority of participants were from the specialty of Clinical Medicine (72.36%), with other students from non-Clinical specialties (e.g. Public Health and Preventive Medicine, etc.). A structured questionnaire was used, measuring five key areas: demographics, scholarly characteristics, current research experience, attitudes toward research barriers, and research expectations. Statistical analyses, including Ordered logistic regression, Spearman's correlation, and Mediation analysis, were employed to assess research expectations' direct and indirect effects on perceived barriers through research interest.
resultsThe study found that the most significant barriers to research were lack of mentorship, heavy academic workload, lack of research skills, and insufficient funding. Students with higher research expectations reported greater perceived barriers, but their higher levels of research interest reduced the perceived impact of these barriers. Mediation analysis found that research interest acted as a mediator between expectations and barriers, with a significant indirect effect of expectations on barriers through interest. This study highlights the complex interaction between research expectations, interest, and perceived barriers in undergraduate medical education.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that while high expectations may increase the awareness of challenges, strong intrinsic interest in research mitigates the impact of these barriers. Integrating more research-related courses into the training program, and providing adequate mentorship and resources to support students' research engagement will help cultivate a research-oriented mindset among medical undergraduates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.